PLC Drives and Automation Forums PLC Drives and Automation Forums  
PLC Drives and Automation Forums  

Go Back   PLC Drives and Automation Forums > Old PLCDrives.com > Archived

Archived This is an import of the old PLC and Drives forum which ran from 2004 to 2006 and was basically a gateway for reading and posting to usenet.

Welcome to the PLC and Drives forum
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos and this advert will disappear. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2005, 08:00 PM
zdriver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Best method for medium range, low data rate communication?

I want to connect 3 seperate buildings in a rural setting to share some
sensor readings, and possibly provide some control between them.
Maximum distance would be 1.25 miles. There is telephone at one
building, but I don't want to install it at the other 2. I would
prefer my own private digital link.

What are my options, buried cable or fibre optic, wireless? Cost is a
factor also as I don't want to remortgage the farm to do it.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2005, 08:25 PM
Joe Soap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Best method for medium range, low data rate communicatio

In response to what zdriver <paul_demarni@telus.net> posted in
news:1132513246.701397.304060@z14g2000cwz.googlegr oups.com:

Quote:
I want to connect 3 seperate buildings in a rural setting to share some
sensor readings, and possibly provide some control between them.
Maximum distance would be 1.25 miles. There is telephone at one
building, but I don't want to install it at the other 2. I would
prefer my own private digital link.

What are my options, buried cable or fibre optic, wireless? Cost is a
factor also as I don't want to remortgage the farm to do it.
Sounds like a job for radio modems. From gbp200 - 450 each.

--
Joe Soap.
JUNK is stuff that you keep for 20 years,
then throw away a week before you need it.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2005, 09:56 AM
Jasen Betts
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Best method for medium range, low data rate communicatio

On 2005-11-20, zdriver <paul_demarni@telus.net> wrote:
Quote:
I want to connect 3 seperate buildings in a rural setting to share some
sensor readings, and possibly provide some control between them.
Maximum distance would be 1.25 miles. There is telephone at one
building, but I don't want to install it at the other 2. I would
prefer my own private digital link.

What are my options, buried cable or fibre optic, wireless? Cost is a
factor also as I don't want to remortgage the farm to do it.
expect to spend a few hundered for cable, conduit is extra I'm fairly sure
that 1.25mi is way too long for ethernet but modems should work OK if that
gives enough throughput.

There may be a tractor implement that can be used to bury the
cable ( I've seen a special plow used to bury light duty irigation pipe. )


have you considered wireless? (most schemes need line of sight so that may
not be an option)



--

Bye.
Jasen
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 05:24 AM
zdriver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Best method for medium range, low data rate communicatio

I actually have to lay a pipe between 2 of the buildings to move water
between them so laying a cable would not be much of an added expense,
but the third building there are no plans for underground services .

Wireless radio modem as suggested by previous post looks appealing, I
am going to check further into them. Who makes the best radio modem for
the $?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 09:32 AM
Joe Soap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Best method for medium range, low data rate communicatio

In response to what zdriver <paul_demarni@telus.net> posted in
news:1132633456.803583.51170@o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com:

Quote:
I actually have to lay a pipe between 2 of the buildings to move water
between them so laying a cable would not be much of an added expense,
but the third building there are no plans for underground services .

Wireless radio modem as suggested by previous post looks appealing, I
am going to check further into them. Who makes the best radio modem for
the $?
In UK, try Pacscom, Wood& Douglas, Treo


--
Joe Soap.
JUNK is stuff that you keep for 20 years,
then throw away a week before you need it.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 12:08 PM
bhauth
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Best method for medium range, low data rate communicatio

How about a couple of cheap slow computers, some wifi cards, and find
some old satellite tv dishes.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
(c) 2007-2008 PLCDrives.com